“CLIMATE CHANGE,” and chem trails, and tremors

April 23, 2024

 

On the day after Earth Day this post seems appropriate.

First off, Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, since at least 1994 has denied  man-made “climate change.”

Then there’s the business of chemtrails, and their relationship to “climate change.”

Oh but wait a minute. That’s just another conspiracy.

I noticed chem trails in the sky the day of the eclipse here, but they weren’t bad enough for me to comment.

Usually, however, they ARE bad, crisscrossing in early morning on any clear blue day to spread into a grey haze by noon and into the evening. I do wonder what they are doing to the supposedly organic vegetables we grow here at Green Acres Permaculture Village. Not to mention the air we breathe, the water we drink.

If everyone’s blood was tested, what nasty chemicals would be in our bodies? Aluminum? Barium?

What disease conditions are either caused or increased by these chemicals? Tremors? Alzheimers?

I google “symptoms of too much aluminum in the body:”

“Liver stenosis and nephrotic syndrome are other important manifestations of aluminum toxicity. Brain and respiratory system can also be severely damaged, followed by aluminum poisoning. Memory loss, tremor, jerk, and death are important manifestations of brain injury.”

How about barium poisoning? I see some notice that barium also causes tremors.

Has there been a study done re: increase in tremors across the U.S. population since, say, the late 1990s? I have an essential tremor. So does one brother, and at least two of my nieces, both of whom are not yet 40!

This is serious business, folks. And there’s no way we can avoid the sky, unless, like Mark Zuckerberg and his “elite” fellows, we dig underground bunkers.

More “chem trails/climate change” memes:

Then there’s the political/economic implications.

Notice how they keep changing the wording? I remember back when it was “global warming.”

So let’s have some fun, shall we?

Alt-Epistemology: Questions about the Azzarello self-immolation

April 22, 2024

 

I remember being blown away by Ted Kaczynski’s extremely trenchant Unabomber Manifesto: Industrial Society and its Future.

I was not nearly so blown away when I read Max Azzarello’s Manifesto, which he published on someone else’s substack:

I have set myself on fire outside the Trump trial.

Both Kaczynski and Max Azzarello were extremely cynical critics of the current way the world is run. With good reason. Both felt so strongly that they were driven to extreme acts of violence.

Kaczynski is much more articulate, his arguments, as I recall (haven’t reread it), all dovetail into a larger perspective; not so for Azzarello. On the other hand, since the Unabomber Manifesto, nearly 30 years, or one Saturn return, ago, one could argue that the world has gotten that much more complicated, opening space for even more corruption. Aside from the fact that, unlike Kaczynski, Azzarello had stuck his finger into  Democratic politics (photographed with Bill Clinton; Bernie supporter), he had obviously grown disgusted with the corruption in both parties, and those who inhabit them. Plus, his main area of concern, crypto, had not even entered the financial ecosystem  in 1995, when Kaczynski penned his manifesto. I feel for Azzarello, a bit crazy, maybe, but who isn’t that endeavors to research deeply into what is really going on.

The Azarrello drama took place last Friday; by Saturday morning, he had supposedly died.

I say supposedly, because I really do wonder if this drama was actually some kind of psy-op, or false flag. Not sure what kind of course, but immediately after the burning, displayed on X/twitter in front of Fox news cameras, I noticed that many many of the comments included the possibility that this man was an MK Ultra victim. That, in other words, he was a targeted individual remotely triggered to throw fistfuls of documents in the air and then light himself on fire, in front of the building where Trump’s trial is being held, just as the jury was finalized.

If so, then why? And is it really true? Is any of it real?

Let’s take these one at a time.

Oh oh! People are talking.
Shit like this will make the CIA nervous.
Be extra wary.https://t.co/Bk1L8SYLWb

— clif (@clif_high) April 21, 2024

If MK Ultra, then WHY. Was it to paint crypto as crazy? (Very possible.) Was it to paint the idea of revolution (his other big themes) as crazy? (Also possible: to control the narrative.) Was it to create an association between Trump and a man burning himself alive? To make Trump and his followers look crazy? (Again, possible.) Or might it have been to distract attention from the Trump trial? Or to just subject us to full prolonged view of a man burning alive (if that is what it was), and thus condition us, mind control us, to even worse atrocities in the future?

What else? What other possibilities? Your guess is as good as mine, and remember, if MK Ultra, if generating a psy-op, a false flag, then there are likely multiple purposes involved.

But what if it wasn’t a psy-op? Or I should say, what if it was a different kind of psy-op, one like many others, designed to keep us guessing (forever!) and thus, in that way, distracting attention for no good reason. A different kind, in that it was meant to look like a man burning himself alive, but it wasn’t, not really.

Lots of commentary on X/twitter re: possibility that he was not a standard burn victim. Here’s the first one I saw. Especially, let me add, the way the people so roughly handled his supposedly burned body, as well as the fact that his body, including his head did not look blackened, at all, except for one photo that Laura Loomer posted, a close-up of his head, which in her photo, did look horrendously blackened, unlike the rest of the body. I tried to get that photo off X/twitter just now, and it has been removed!

https://x.com/numberonepal/status/1781804253947781260

What’s real, folks? Who knows what’s what. Or how? Or, especially, why.

Oops! One more. What if the Azzarello burning was some kind of scheduled sacrifice!

Geez!

Let’s just stay open to all (expanding) possibilities, while simultaneously sharpening the point of our discernment spear.