WAR OR PEACE: Reflections on the Ubiquity of Frequency

I was one of those kids who was terrible at math. Ever since I asked my teacher in first grade, “But, but, but . . .What is a number?”

Sister Bernita turned around from the blackboard and stared at me, so long my cheeks burned and the other kids turned to stare at me, too.

Then she said, slowly, “That is not a question, dear.”

Yes, that is not a question, dear. Had math been taught differently . . .

 

Matter is merely energy in a state of vibration . . . Wow. Yes.

Allow me to remind you of a twitter post I put up yesterday on this blog . . . “It only takes one soul . . .”

Moreover . . .

Remember John Lilly? His breakthrough communication with dolphins? I sure do.

Mattias Desmet offers his own deep understanding of the ubiquity of frequency . . .

Note: Please do read the entire post. It helps to dispel all sorts of illusions. Here is how he ends this missive:

At the core of the issue, therefore, the world problem does not lie so much with a small group of people, but with a certain ‘program’ on which humanity operates. That ‘program’ is materialism and rationalism, a worldview that tells humanity that nothing exists but matter—dead little marbles bumping against each other—and that the highest goal of humanity is to survive. Or conversely, commit suicide directly—that’s also a possible conclusion. In any case, you don’t need to take ethics and humanity into account; they don’t exist in this universe of rocks and stones. Only an idiot harms themselves by considering ethics and making sacrifices for truth. This worldview has indeed allowed a certain elite to rise to the top, who have a malicious talent for throwing all ethics overboard, but if it weren’t for the fact that a large group was all too willing to step into this worldview, that elite would never have become the elite. I know that anti-elite thinking is very popular both on the left and right of the political spectrum, but it doesn’t warm me up. The elite, ultimately, is a reflection of the population.

To conclude today, I return once again to the vibrating plate with sand grains. That plate shows us something else. If the frequency of the vibrations changes slightly, a completely different pattern immediately appears in an untraceable and breathtaking way. In other words, no matter how much the sand grains of society and the world organize themselves under the sign of the darkest shape, a change in frequency can, in the blink of an eye, summon a different shape and make it the organizing principle. That frequency change, which boils down to a change in the quality of speech. To put it simply: society currently organizes itself on the frequency of propaganda and manipulative speech (and the metaphysical forces in which propaganda is rooted); when the frequency of sincerity and truth comes to the foreground, human coexistence will normally take on a completely different shape in the blink of an eye. Every person who sounds a different, sincere note contributes to that revolution—the revolution that is the logical consequence of the revolution that ushered in the Enlightenment culture in the seventeenth century.

What kind of frequency do you transmit?

What kind of frequency do I transmit?

Our future depends on us.

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ann Kreilkamp
Ph.D. 81

Rogue philosopher, astrologer, published author, conference presenter, world traveler, founder & editor of Crone Chronicles: A Journal of Conscious Aging (1989-2001) , and founding visionary of Green Acres Permaculture Village (2010 to present).

Current Archives

Subscribe to Updates

Recent Comments

Scroll to Top