53-47? 52-48? A Discourse on Drivel

 

Fallout from the 2022 mid-term election drama, still smeared by Jupiter/Neptune square Mars confusion, check this out:

Here’s the result of the supposed poll Elon took on whether or not to reinstate Trump to Twitter. The yes votes won, 53-47. Hmmm . . . those numbers, together, look so damn familiar! Well, folks they are. No less than eight Q posts mentioned the 53-47 ratio, most of them having to do with the majority needed to control the U.S. Senate.

Oops! I misspoke. Here’s, apparently, the final tally.

Which is, it appears, eerily similar to a temporary tally on November 14 of Maricopa County, Katie Hobbs over Kari Lake.

In any case, I do sense that Elon’s “final result” for the Trump reinstatement poll was deliberately chosen to be 53-47; oops, 52-48.

AND: notice the five year Q delta!

 

One wonders: Did Elon make up this ratio, to signal something else? In any case, here we are, Trumpers and never-Trumpers, anxiously (or humorously) awaiting . . .

 

Oh wow, here’s two more occasions where the both the 53-47, and the 52-48 tallies counted for a lot.

Aaah, let’ s not end on that note. Instead, did you know that 53 and 47 are both prime numbers? Not sure what that means in this (or any) context, but after all does anything mean anything in a world where numbers can be jiggled endlessly by hidden players with hidden algorithms to slightly favor one “side” over the other? 

All in all . . .

 

 

 

2 thoughts on “53-47? 52-48? A Discourse on Drivel

    1. I asked wp support about it, and they said “it’s for marketing purposes.” When I wondered why you shouldn’t be allowed to go where you want to go, they asked me this question — which I quote exactly, because not sure I understand it. “Can you make a reply to them, and ask them to forward the email to you, which they got from you.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 + fourteen =

%d bloggers like this: