Astrologer, published author, conference presenter, world traveler, founder & editor of Crone Chronicles: A Journal of Conscious Aging (1989-2001) , and founding visionary of Green Acres Permaculture Village (2010 to present).
I watched Dr. Steven Greer’s June 12th press conference for his Disclosure Project and took notes on what stood out for me.
As of now:
More: aspects of the following claims really startled even me, who has been more or less read in to what’s public knowledge, due to attending UFO conferences for a number of years.
Throughout his presentation, Greer was adamant: THERE ARE NO HOSTILE ET SPECIES. All “threats” are man-made.
One of his whistleblowers later said that human advanced technologies are now so lethal that they pose a real danger to ET species.
Greer’s claim that ETs are uniformly friendly is buttressed by his argument that given how technologically advanced they are, they could have blasted us to oblivion long ago; and the fact that they have not, despite our attempts to obliterate them, testifies to their uniformly non-violent nature.
Throughout his 40 minute presentation, Greer spoke with such an urgency and authentic emotionality, that it startled me. At an International UFO Conference about 20 years ago, his heart did not seem so open. Greer seems especially worried about what he claims are “execution” threats to his whistleblowers. He claims that there are “two clocks ticking now”:
On stage with him were a number of whistleblowers, those, he said, courageous enough to choose to go public. He claims to have testimonies from many more, who want to remain anonymous due to threats to their own lives and those of their families, and urged many times, that all disclosure whistleblowers receive protection for their own security.
I resonated especially with two of these whistleblowers:
The fourth speaker, D.C. Long., said that as a young men, both he and his Dad refused to sign NDAs after witnessing some kind of UFO incident (I forget now the details). As a result, his Dad, who had been on his way to becoming becoming a rich man with a productive career, was left destitute and homeless, when everything he owned was taken away. Later he asked his Dad if his destitution happened because of that incident and his Dad was adamant, told him to never mention it again.
That’s the kind of terror that can be invoked by the thuggish Illegal Secret Government.
And yet, as Greer quoted, “If good men do nothing, then evil men will prevail.”
The fifth speaker, Eric Hecker, then a Raytheon contractor, told of being at the south pole in 2010 and discovering a Directed Energy Facility there that, among other functions, can generate earthquakes and may be used to decimate ET. (I just went to his website, deciphering.tv, and wow! Plan to look further into it.)
If you haven't read about Operation Highjump, it's amazing what Adm. Byrd saw.
The Nazis were so far advanced and benefitted from demonic influence.
Listen to what Antarctica whistleblower Eric Hecker has seen there. pic.twitter.com/7mrPZZFJ4K— Xappeal (@_Tweetiez) June 15, 2023
There is much more in this three-hour broadcast that actually held me spell-bound all the way through (rare.)
And yet, and yet, I will always, perhaps, wonder if Greer is correct in his consistent and insistent claim that there are no hostile ETs. It seems much more likely to me (and possibly the majority of the UFO community) that So Below, As Above! In other words, if we deal with good and evil here on earth, forced to constantly use our free will to discern which is which, would not this be the case elsewhere?
Moreover, might it be true that whatever or whoever is running this show on earth isn’t human, but sourced beyond this plane — fooling with us, playing with us, and using our fear, our loosh, as their food? And worse: for example, consider Moloch. A Canaanite deity, is he not also an ET? Might Moloch still be running the world, given the horrific child sacrifice news now surfacing?
Here’s a twitter post that to me, feels unusually balanced in this whole question about the motives for various ET’s, including what seems to me an important distinction, between ET species and ET individuals:


The Civil Rights Movement is one of those eras in history that make us proud; proud to be American, proud to be human. Who can forget its iconic martyr, Martin Luther King, his ringing words that inspired a nation?
And yet, it turns out that this momentous turning in American life is having unintended consequences, namely an increasingly fragile “system of systems” due to decreasing competence of people who work within them.
America must be understood as a system of interwoven systems; the healthcare system sends a bill to a patient using the postal system, and that patient uses the mobile phone system to pay the bill with a credit card issued by the banking system. All these systems must be assumed to work for anyone to make even simple decisions. But the failure of one system has cascading consequences for all of the adjacent systems. As a consequence of escalating rates of failure, America’s complex systems are slowly collapsing.
In short:
The core issue is that changing political mores have established the systematic promotion of the unqualified and sidelining of the competent. This has continually weakened our society’s ability to manage modern systems. At its inception, it represented a break from the trend of the 1920s to the 1960s, when the direct meritocratic evaluation of competence became the norm across vast swaths of American society.
In the first decades of the twentieth century, the idea that individuals should be systematically evaluated and selected based on their ability rather than wealth, class, or political connections, led to significant changes in selection techniques at all levels of American society. The Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) revolutionized college admissions by allowing elite universities to find and recruit talented students from beyond the boarding schools of New England. Following the adoption of the SAT, aptitude tests such as Wonderlic (1936), Graduate Record Examination (1936), Army General Classification Test (1941), and Law School Admission Test (1948) swept the United States. Spurred on by the demands of two world wars, this system of institutional management electrified the Tennessee Valley, created the first atom bomb, invented the transistor, and put a man on the moon.
By the 1960s, the systematic selection for competence came into direct conflict with the political imperatives of the civil rights movement. During the period from 1961 to 1972, a series of Supreme Court rulings, executive orders, and laws — most critically, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 — put meritocracy and the new political imperative of protected-group diversity on a collision course. Administrative law judges have accepted statistically observable disparities in outcomes between groups as prima facie evidence of illegal discrimination. The result has been clear: any time meritocracy and diversity come into direct conflict, diversity must take priority.
This entire — long, detailed, analytic — article is well worth reading:
In the interest of accuracy, DEI, or Diversity Equity Inclusion needs to have its letters reversed, to Diversity Inclusion, Equity: DIE.
This developing systemic disaster is nobody’s “fault.” It’s simply a massive and accelerating unintended consequence of a glorious ideal.
How do we work with this knowledge, this contradiction between what we wanted and, given what seemed to be needed to get there, we actually got?
So important to continuously remember that people are of equal value, but not of equal competence, or I should say, not of equal competence in any particular area of expression. Every human being is unique. Each one a genius! — if allowed and encouraged to follow his or her original nature.
Give people their heads, connected to their hearts, and they will flourish, no matter what the color of their skin.
Force people to “measure up” to something external to them, then only the most advantaged will flourish.
It’s time each of us takes back our sovereignty. Build the new world from there, one free of systems of systems that capture free individuals into preformed slots, forcing them to ignore or repress the parts of themselves that if, allowed to unleash would ignite an explosion of creativity on this planet.
Yes. Let us re-imagine the dreaded nuclear blast as a miraculous explosion of creativity.
P.S. I know this sounds utopian, impossible.
Start here, inside yourself.
What would you be doing in life if there were no obstacles?
Take one tiny baby step in that direction.
Come on, you can do it!
Take another baby step,
no matter how foolish you feel.
Pay attention to any synchronicities that arise
for they are trail markers, blazing the path ahead
Take another baby step.
Keep going.
Watch the world rearrange itself in the direction of your intent.
The new world will arise through thousands, millions, billions of tiny experiments
(and experiments imply both failure and success; with each failure, learn from it and keep going)
performed by those who are taking back their sovereignty,
trusting the universe,
knowing deep inside
that if they follow their nature,
nature will take care of them.

”And you? My teacher looked up, his left eyebrow arched, pencil poised. 'I want to do a paper on the concept of time.’” I mumbled, timidly. 'Time?' He sniffed. “I wouldn’t touch the subject. Too difficult.” — AK, 1967
Ph.D. 83
Astrologer, published author, conference presenter, world traveler, founder & editor of Crone Chronicles: A Journal of Conscious Aging (1989-2001) , and founding visionary of Green Acres Permaculture Village (2010 to present).
Copyright © 2025 All rights reserved.
Yes!