Further Sussmann Trial Reverberations

June 1, 2022

Is the court room drama we have just been subjected to complete baloney? And if so, did Durham know it would be, going in?

If Sussmann “ran” what a whistleblower claims is an FBI office? portal? inside Perkins Coie, then how could it be that Sussmann “went to the FBI with information, ” and Sussmann “lied to the FBI” — as if he was not embedded within the FBI? What a complete joke.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/06/01/tucker-carlson-drops-bombshell-about-fbi-and-perkins-coie-workspace-n573208

Even without that bombshell revelation, let’s put this entire clown show in perspective, and not make a big deal out of it. Yes, we know that D.C. is a swamp, that the justice system is corrupt, that the entire federal government is riddled with corruption (remember the Pluto Return process), so why are we surprised by yesterday’s verdict? Is it because, like me, we had somehow counted on Durham to “save” the day?

Or is there a larger perspective at play, the x22 report sting theory, for example, in which this acquittal is simply further grist for the mill: “Durham got what he needed, Pawn sacrificed . . .”

BioClandestine never did focus on the Sussmann trial, figuring it was of way less import than the continuing revelations about U.S. involvement in bioweapons labs.

GOOD NEWS! (Pandemic Treaty Defeated) and BAD NEWS? (Sussmann Declared Innocent)

May 31, 2022

THE GOOD NEWS

I was interested in the fact that results of the so-called Pandemic Treaty, which would have brought 194 nations under control by the WHO, and thus eviscerated national sovereignty, was not immediately obvious. I had heard rumors, but it took until this morning for me to find the kind of source that would make sense of the rumors. I thank  Celia Farber’s substack post for pointing to these two articles:

WHO Forced into Humiliating Backdown

— and for background, this:

Biden Backed WHO Treaty Amendment Would Yield United States Public Health Powers to UN

THE BAD NEWS?

Then, this morning, news that Sussmann got off, a verdict which Margot Cleveland predicted, in a post published early this morning, which referred back to a post she published on May 27, she reiterated that, even if he is acquitted, it leaves all the damning testimony intact, which makes me wonder if this result may have been Durham’s intent in the first place.

Even if the Jury Doesn’t Convict Michael Sussmann, the Special Counsel Has Won

After the acquittal, Cleveland wrote:

Jury Acquits Clinton Campaign Attorney but Prosecutors Prove corporate Media Guilty

with this subtitle:

In any case, we’re left with further confirmation that justice cannot be achieved in the D.C. swamp (Compare the January 6 “insurrectionists,” still rotting in D.C. prison.)

If you recall, Judge Cooper, was appointed by Obama, and his wife is Lisa Page’s attorney.

Plus, several jurors had gifted to HRC campaigns, and both Sussmann and one of the jurors have children on the same sports team.

As for Judge Cooper: Remember that he volunteered to recuse himself, but Durham said it wouldn’t be necessary. In that post I figured that this means that Durham knows that Cooper must have integrity (else why would he volunteer to recuse himself?). Now I wonder if it’s because Durham knew this acquittal was coming, that in fact, it’s part of a gigantic sting op that Dave of X22 Report says is being wrapped around the rotting D.C. miasm, throwing an even more incriminating light on the entire U.S. justice system.

Techno Fog weighs in here:

Michael Sussmann has been Acquitted