Russophobia is nothing new. “Russia Russia Russia” is just the latest iteration. And the current “proxy war” in Ukraine is the latest disputed territory to suck up billions of rapidly deflating U.S. dollars.
Besides, in order to go to war, you need an enemy, right? And that enemy must be viewed as entirely evil, right? And who benefits from all wars, often funding and even arming both sides? The military industrial bankster complex.
Even so, can you imagine?
The West Can’t Even Understand Why Russia Sees it As a Threat
Well, frankly, it seems obvious to me. All you have to do is superimpose a U.S. map on the map of Russia, and it becomes obvious. (Note: Russia has eleven time zones; the U.S. mainland, four.) Russia is both scarcely populated and enormously rich in natural resources. All the transnational resource-sucking industrial behemoths would LOVE to get their hands on it. And since the government and the corporation have basically merged here in the U.S., we can not just speculate, but know without a doubt, that underneath all the excuses, underneath the various interpretations of the historical sagas of any of the Russian borderlands plus the jockeying for power by this and that political and/or theological faction, what’s responsible for the continuous drumbeat for war with Russia is sheer territorial greed by “elite” psychopaths with no conscience, no remorse, just an endless hunger that cannot be satisfied, no matter how much they acquire in the material world.
Here’s another perspective:
Re: Ukraine: Remember Scott Ritter? He was the UN Inspector in Iraq in 2003 who said that, contrary to western propaganda, there were NO WMDs in Iraq. And that, in fact, the U.S. goal was regime change, not disarmament. So, what’s new? In any case, I consider this person as worthy of trust.
Nuclear Armageddon? The ‘Realist’ Fear bout Russia-Ukraine Conflict Sparking Nuclear War
Is Actually Groundless