And, what do I even mean by “real,” in an surreal era when masking, disguising, one’s — real? face-lifted? sourpuss? smiling? grim? — face is considered politically correct, even virtuous?

However: a young female friend of mine says she’s actually grateful for masks, because now she doesn’t have to wear make-up!

A Personal Story

Except for a bit of lipstick when much younger, I never did “wear make-up” — except for that one time as a high school senior when my mom wanted me to go with her to get a demonstration make-up job by a cosmetic company. The ordeal took at least an hour. Of course, the artist was proud of what she had accomplished, and showed me my plastered face in the mirror. Ye gods! As soon as we got home I marched straight to the bathroom and scrubbed it off. Mom loved her makeover, kept it on all day.

I always wanted to be real. As a teenager, the focus on wearing pretty clothes and make-up, indulged by other females in our large family, also repulsed me, and I would wail: why so much focus on “appearances”? I want to know what’s going on inside!

In my 20s, this obsession with the idea that people weren’t being real, that they were all wearing “masks,” took a sociological bent: not just the face, but behavior, purpose, meaning — all these were masked, in that everybody was always playing a role!

I remember going back home to visit family as a young wife (role) and mother (role). The entire experience would make me horribly confused. Who was I, as an adult at home with my parents ? Was I daughter, wife, or mother? And yet all three roles felt fake! I wanted to be real! But how?

As a graduate student in philosophy, my original obsession with the difference between appearances and reality made me determined to investigate the masks I was wearing, the roles I was playing, the ways in which I had been indoctrinated into enacting a false identity. I was determined to let go of it all and uncover my own reality. This investigation dropped me down into the unconscious mind, where I endured an excruciating transformation, dropping all masks, stripping off the many roles enacted by my persona, or self-image, that I had been taught to show to others. This left me, for awhile, naked, vulnerable, strange, at the mercy of those around me — and grateful for my mentor in this profound unveiling process, who protected me from ridicule.

In my mid-30s, I began to study astrology, and the distinction this ancient language makes, between the Ascendant, or the self-image one shows to others, and the Self, the Sun, was immensely helpful in aiding me both to identify and separate the two, persona (Ascendant) and Self (Sun), for everyone whose chart I constructed.

In the Political Realm

For the past two years, the entire global population has been immersed in a dystopian nightmare in which mask-wearing is ubiquitous, so constant for most people as to seem “the new normal.” My original childhood fears on a metaphysical/psychological/sociological plane have morphed into full- blown materialization, with the entire phenomenon ignited and spurred on by controllers who pump F.E.A.R. (False Evidence Appearing Real)!

In the political realm, here are a few perplexities of late, involving actors on the world stage, currently up for review.

GENERAL FLYNN. Is he really a heroic white hat, like we always thought he was? Or is he actually a black hat pretending to be a white hat? Or has he recently flipped, from white to black? Or is he pretending to have flipped, and if so why? On and on. This question, brought up originally by Lin Wood, has been bandied about by Michael Jaco and others, including Tarot by Janine, who, to me, has the most interesting perspective, as teased out by her Tarot cards.

DONALD TRUMP. The question of whether or not the real Trump was on stage in Arizona is by now ubiquitous. All sorts of people have weighed in, with Janine, Magenta Pixie, Utsava, and others in the more “psychic” realms saying no, that this was a Trump double. The hat coverinng the eyes, the very unusual lack of a tie, both, some say, were clues. More interesting is speculation as to why he was not the real Trump on this particular occasion, with Janine’s cards hinting that something drastic had just happened, and so sudden change of plans. She wondered out loud if it was because they just discovered Flynn was a traitor. Who knows?

JOE BIDEN. Then there’s Biden. Oh my. However, his press conference yesterday did feel a bit different to me. Though as ever, I couldn’t bear to watch it,  but waited instead for clips to appear, and given the (hopefully expanding) epistemological silo I tend to operate in, I assumed these would be clips showing him as a stumbling, awkward, bumbling idiot. However, I didn’t see that this time in the one clip I watched, from minute 42 through 46. Instead, I saw him as someone actually trying to understand questions, and then either not-so-artfully evade them or actually take a shot at answering them in some manner or other. Can’t remember who referred me to that clip, but he referenced it as the usual awkward, bumbling presence. But is this the best he could do to further demonstrate Biden’s demented state?

Notice that this press conference was two hours long, very unlike Biden. So what gives?

The easiest, and I’d say, most likely, answer would be to say that whoever is the actor playing Biden was instructed to not act as feeble, demented, fumbling. But instead to appear to at least stand straight and more, as I noted above. Jeff Rense has another take on this situation, which Clif High pointed to: Biden a Borg?

Oh wait a minute. That article was from January, 2021!

Oh well . . . as usual, it pays to notice the timing of events and perspectives on them.

The article was interesting even so, the supposition that Biden, by this time, may be not a clone, nor an actor, but a borg. It includes lots of pics of supposed morgellons fibers, which remind me very much of what’s been found in the vaccines . . .

And I do wonder,  if the actor Biden was instructed to act more alert, more awake, younger than before, during the press conference, then WHY? What does this possible new black hat? twist in the complex, ever-changing plot signify?

ANTHONY FAUCI. Then, finally, how about Fauci. More and more people are pointing out that this supposed “sacrificial lamb” for the virus-psy-op-that-appears-to-be-ending-now is so narcissistic that he doesn’t even realize his altered role!

Clinical definition of “narcissism”:

” . . .behind this mask of extreme confidence lies a fragile self-esteem that’s vulnerable to the slightest criticism.” Mask. MASK. MASK!

Okay, what do you make of this photograph, recently put up by Santa Surfing on Telegram:

Narcissism personified!

And yet the photo shows Famous Fraud Fauci only from behind . . .

Now check out what’s on the screen in front of him. Hmmm . . . same photo mirrored.

Who took the original photo? And why the mirroring?

Aha! Just saw on Telegram that Fauci’s watching this scene from the Fauci film. Even more narcissistic!

All I can say is this must be a comm. What kind, I have no idea.

Reality is even more masked than we are.